<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 876 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=129030</link>
    <description>Waiver of pre-deposit was allowed where service tax demands arose from denial of abatement under Notification No. 32/04-S.T. for certain transporters on the ground that declarations of non-availment of CENVAT credit and Notification No. 12/03-S.T. benefit were not produced. The applicants argued that the service providers were only truck owners and not goods transport agencies, so they were not liable to service tax or registration. Finding prima facie force in that submission and noting the absence of any finding that the transport providers were registered or proceeded against for non-registration or non-payment, the Tribunal stayed recovery of tax, interest and penalties pending the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:08:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 876 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=129030</link>
      <description>Waiver of pre-deposit was allowed where service tax demands arose from denial of abatement under Notification No. 32/04-S.T. for certain transporters on the ground that declarations of non-availment of CENVAT credit and Notification No. 12/03-S.T. benefit were not produced. The applicants argued that the service providers were only truck owners and not goods transport agencies, so they were not liable to service tax or registration. Finding prima facie force in that submission and noting the absence of any finding that the transport providers were registered or proceeded against for non-registration or non-payment, the Tribunal stayed recovery of tax, interest and penalties pending the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=129030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>