Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on the facts found, the sale of firewood could again be subjected to sales tax when tax had already been collected at the first sale and the statutory scheme confined the commodity to a single taxable point.
Analysis: The commodity was held to be firewood throughout, and the levy applicable during the relevant period was a single-point levy under section 5(vii) of the General Sales Tax Act, 1125, read with the notification issued thereunder. Section 11-A(1) further enabled the Government, in respect of goods sold by it, to collect the tax amount that a registered dealer could have collected, with the combined effect of treating the State as approximating a registered dealer for this limited purpose. Since sales tax had already been collected from the respondent at the first sale by the forest department, a further levy on the subsequent sale would defeat the single-point scheme.
Conclusion: The second levy was impermissible, and the revision petition failed.
Final Conclusion: The statutory scheme restricted taxation to one taxable occasion in the chain of sales, and the respondent was not liable to be taxed again on the same commodity after tax had already been collected at the first sale.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a commodity is subjected by statute and notification to a single-point sales tax, and tax has already been collected at the first taxable sale, a subsequent sale of the same commodity cannot be taxed again.