Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit on service tax paid for outdoor catering services used for a factory canteen was admissible, and whether pre-deposit and recovery of the disputed tax and penalty should be stayed pending appeal.
Analysis: The dispute concerned credit on outdoor catering services availed for employees' canteen facility in the factory. The Tribunal treated the issue as covered by earlier Tribunal and Larger Bench decisions holding that outdoor catering services used in such circumstances qualify as input service under Rule 2(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. On that basis, the appellant was held to have made out a strong prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit was held to be prima facie admissible on the outdoor catering services, and pre-deposit of the disputed tax, interest, and penalty was dispensed with while recovery was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: Outdoor catering services availed for a factory canteen may constitute input service for Cenvat credit purposes, and a strong prima facie case on that question can justify waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.