<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 593 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128535</link>
    <description>Outdoor catering services used for a factory canteen were treated as prima facie qualifying as input service under Rule 2(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, following earlier Tribunal and Larger Bench decisions. On that basis, Cenvat credit on service tax paid for the canteen service was regarded as prima facie admissible. The Tribunal also found a strong prima facie case for interim relief and dispensed with pre-deposit of the disputed tax, interest, and penalty while staying recovery pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 09:20:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=165404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 593 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128535</link>
      <description>Outdoor catering services used for a factory canteen were treated as prima facie qualifying as input service under Rule 2(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, following earlier Tribunal and Larger Bench decisions. On that basis, Cenvat credit on service tax paid for the canteen service was regarded as prima facie admissible. The Tribunal also found a strong prima facie case for interim relief and dispensed with pre-deposit of the disputed tax, interest, and penalty while staying recovery pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>