Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty and interest could be waived or reduced where the assessee, described as a job worker, had cleared goods without payment of duty but had paid the duty before issuance of the show cause notice.
Analysis: The appellant's role as a job worker did not displace liability for duty on the manufactured goods. The duty had already been paid before the show cause notice and appropriated, but the only surviving question was the liability to penalty and interest. In a case involving suppression and clearance without payment of duty, the authority had no discretion to levy penalty below the prescribed amount or to waive interest.
Conclusion: Penalty and interest were held to be payable, and no reduction or waiver was allowed.