Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an assessment under section 13(5) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1947, is valid for the entire period of taxable business activity notwithstanding that the dealer applied for registration during part of that period.
Analysis: Section 4 is the charging provision and creates the liability to sales tax. Section 13(5) is a machinery provision enabling assessment to the best of judgment where the Commissioner is satisfied that a dealer liable to tax has failed to apply for registration or furnish required particulars. The liability to pay tax does not depend on the validity or timing of the registration application. To read section 13(5) as restricting assessment until registration would nullify the charging provision and produce an unreasonable result, leaving an unregistered dealer in a better position than a registered dealer. The power to require returns from unregistered dealers under section 12(1) and Rule 20 supports the view that assessment machinery applies to unregistered dealers as well.
Conclusion: The assessment under section 13(5) for the whole period was valid, and the question was answered against the assessee and in favour of the State.
Ratio Decidendi: Liability created by a charging section is not dependent on registration, and a provision authorising assessment of unregistered dealers operates as assessment machinery rather than as a condition precedent to tax liability.