Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner's contract works turnover was exempt from sales tax under the proviso to Section 4(1) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act because the contract was entered into before the Act came into force.
Analysis: The Act was brought into force for the relevant provisions only from 1 August 1947 by notification, whereas the contract work had commenced and payments had been made before that date. The proviso to Section 4(1) expressly saved sales involved in the execution of contracts entered into on or before the notified date. The fact that the Department treated the tender acceptance date as decisive was not accepted, because the evidence showed that the work was being performed under an existing agreement before the Act commenced. The proviso did not require the contract to be written, and the tax was on the contractor's turnover, not on the form of the contract.
Conclusion: The turnover arising from the contract was exempt from taxation, and the penalty imposed could not stand.
Final Conclusion: The petition succeeded, the assessment and penalty were set aside, and refund of any tax already paid was directed.
Ratio Decidendi: A contract entered into before the commencement date notified under the taxing statute falls within a saving proviso exempting sales involved in its execution, and the exemption is not confined to written contracts.