<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1955 (7) TMI 12 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127369</link>
    <description>Contract work turnover was treated as exempt from sales tax under the saving proviso to Section 4(1) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act because the agreement was entered into, and work had already begun, before the notified commencement date. The proviso was applied to sales involved in executing contracts existing on or before that date, and the Department&#039;s reliance on the tender acceptance date was rejected on the evidence. The exemption was held not to depend on the contract being written, since the tax attached to the contractor&#039;s turnover and not to the form of the agreement. The penalty could not stand, and assessment consequences were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 10:07:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1955 (7) TMI 12 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127369</link>
      <description>Contract work turnover was treated as exempt from sales tax under the saving proviso to Section 4(1) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act because the agreement was entered into, and work had already begun, before the notified commencement date. The proviso was applied to sales involved in executing contracts existing on or before that date, and the Department&#039;s reliance on the tender acceptance date was rejected on the evidence. The exemption was held not to depend on the contract being written, since the tax attached to the contractor&#039;s turnover and not to the form of the agreement. The penalty could not stand, and assessment consequences were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>