Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in proceedings for a scheme of arrangement under section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956, the Court could dispense with the shareholders' meeting altogether and, in any event, dispense with the procedural formalities for convening and holding the meeting.
Analysis: Section 391 empowers the Court to direct a meeting to be held in such manner as it thinks fit, and the allied procedural rules recognise the Court's power to regulate practice and prevent abuse of process. On that basis, the Court may relax procedural formalities such as notice, advertisement and other convening requirements where the circumstances justify such relaxation and justice so requires. However, the Court cannot dispense with a requirement imposed by the statute itself. Since the meeting of shareholders is a statutory step for considering the proposed scheme, it cannot be omitted altogether, even if the meeting may be informal and the procedural steps may be simplified.
Conclusion: The request to dispense with the shareholders' meeting was rejected, but the Court permitted dispensation of convening formalities and issued directions for holding the meetings and reporting the result.