Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner's municipal appeal could be disposed of without affording an effective opportunity of hearing, and whether the orders confirming the demolition direction and rejecting the appeal were liable to be quashed.
Analysis: The appeal before the Municipal Council was required to be decided in a quasi-judicial capacity. A statutory right of appeal carries with it the requirement of a fair opportunity to be heard, which is part of natural justice. On the facts, the appeal memorandum was only read and rejected; it did not amount to a complete written representation of the petitioner's case, and the petitioner had expressly asked that his advocate be heard. In these circumstances, the Council's disposal of the appeal without giving an effective opportunity to present the case orally or otherwise was contrary to the principles of natural justice.
Conclusion: The orders rejecting the appeal and affirming the demolition direction were liable to be quashed, and the appeal had to be reheard after giving the petitioner an effective opportunity of hearing.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an appellate authority acts quasi-judicially, a statutory appeal must be decided after affording an effective opportunity of hearing, and a summary rejection of the appeal without such opportunity violates natural justice and is liable to be quashed.