Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 30/2004-C.E. when credit of duty paid on inputs, though initially taken, was reversed before utilization, and whether such reversal satisfied the condition of non-availment of credit.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the effect of simultaneous reversal of credit in relation to goods covered by the exemption notification. The Tribunal followed its earlier decisions and the Board's circular, which treated reversal before utilization as equivalent to not taking credit. The same approach had already been accepted in prior Tribunal decisions and upheld in connected litigation, and the circular clarified that the exemption could not be denied where credit stood reversed before use. The conditions of the notification were therefore met in substance.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the exemption under Notification No. 30/2004-C.E., and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The order of the Commissioner was sustained and the Revenue's appeal was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where Cenvat credit taken on inputs is reversed before utilization, the condition of non-availment of credit for an exemption notification is satisfied.