Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Commissioner of Customs, Coimbatore could suspend the CHA licence issued by him on the basis of misconduct relating to the separate Mumbai licence, in the absence of Form-C intimation enabling the Coimbatore licence to operate within Mumbai jurisdiction.
Analysis: The licence issued by the Coimbatore Commissioner and the licence issued by the Mumbai Commissioner were treated as operating in mutually exclusive fields unless Form-C intimation was given to the concerned Customs Station. Regulation 20(2) empowered suspension pending or in contemplation of inquiry by the licensing authority, but only in relation to the licence and the jurisdiction in which that licence was operative. Since the Coimbatore licence had no operation within Mumbai jurisdiction without Form-C intimation, misconduct occurring in Mumbai under the Mumbai licence could not furnish a valid basis for suspending the Coimbatore licence.
Conclusion: The Coimbatore Commissioner had no authority to suspend the Coimbatore CHA licence on the ground of alleged misconduct connected with the Mumbai licence; the suspension order was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: A CHA licence can be suspended only by the authority competent for the licence or for the jurisdiction in which that licence is permitted to operate, and misconduct attributable to a separate licence outside that field cannot justify suspension of another licence absent the requisite intimation and operational nexus.