Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported goods, namely Maduramycin Ammonium 1%, were entitled to concessional customs duty under Notification No. 20/99-Cus as goods falling within the relevant description in the notified List 1.
Analysis: The classification of the goods under Chapter 23 of the Customs Tariff was not in dispute, and the goods were meant for use in animal feed. The relevant notification covered veterinary drugs and other goods specified in List 1, in which Maduramycin Ammonium was expressly named. The record also showed that an identical benefit had later been granted under the successor notification for similar imports, and the manufacturer's declaration supported the assessee's description of the product as Maduramycin Ammonium 1% with carrier only. The Revenue did not dispute these factual assertions.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the concessional benefit under the notification, and the demand was unsustainable.