<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 567 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123488</link>
    <description>Imported Maduramycin Ammonium 1% was held to qualify for concessional customs duty under Notification No. 20/99-Cus because it fell within the goods specifically named in List 1. The product was classified under Chapter 23, was intended for animal feed use, and the manufacturer&#039;s declaration supported its description as Maduramycin Ammonium 1% with carrier only. The record also showed that an identical benefit had been granted under the successor notification for similar imports, and the Revenue did not dispute the material facts. On that basis, the concessional exemption was available and the duty demand was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:23:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 567 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123488</link>
      <description>Imported Maduramycin Ammonium 1% was held to qualify for concessional customs duty under Notification No. 20/99-Cus because it fell within the goods specifically named in List 1. The product was classified under Chapter 23, was intended for animal feed use, and the manufacturer&#039;s declaration supported its description as Maduramycin Ammonium 1% with carrier only. The record also showed that an identical benefit had been granted under the successor notification for similar imports, and the Revenue did not dispute the material facts. On that basis, the concessional exemption was available and the duty demand was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>