Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit taken on inputs used exclusively in the manufacture of exempted final products could be denied or recovered under Rule 6(2) and Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002, when the credit had already been reversed with interest.
Analysis: The inputs in question were found to have been used only in the manufacture of exempted products and not in any dutiable final products. On that footing, Rule 6(2) was wrongly invoked, as the situation was covered by Rule 6(1), which prohibits availment of credit on inputs relatable to exempted final products. Once the entire credit had been reversed with interest, no further demand could survive with reference to the exempted clearances. The demand under Rule 6(3), therefore, lacked legal foundation.
Conclusion: The demand was not sustainable and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The impugned demand and consequential action could not be sustained, and the appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Where inputs are used exclusively for exempted final products, the case falls under Rule 6(1) and not Rule 6(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002, and reversal of the credit with interest negatives any further demand under Rule 6(3).