Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether man-made grey fabrics dealt with by a registered dealer retained the character of "input" for the purpose of Cenvat credit under the notification and rules governing such credit.
Analysis: The expression "input" was treated as a relative concept, depending upon the stage and the user to whom the goods are passed on. Grey fabrics were a finished product for the manufacturer, but they remained an input for the processor who used them for further processing. The introduction of an intermediary dealer did not alter the intrinsic character of the goods as inputs. The credit scheme under the notification was intended to operate in relation to stock held by traders as well as processors, and the departmental view based on the dealer's intermediate role was rejected.
Conclusion: The grey fabrics were to be treated as inputs in the hands of the dealer, and the appellant was entitled to the credit claimed.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the denial of credit was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Whether goods are "inputs" for Cenvat purposes depends on their role in the relevant supply chain and user context, and their character as inputs is not lost merely because they pass through an intermediary dealer.