Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether re-rollable scrap purchased from the open market and used in the manufacture of M.S. rods was eligible for exemption under Notification Nos. 90/88-C.E. and 202/88-C.E.
Analysis: The exemption was considered in the light of the Ministry's Circular No. 27/89 dated 21-9-89 and the explanatory deeming provision in Notification No. 202/88-C.E., which treated stocks of inputs in the country as duty-paid except where clearly recognizable as non-duty paid or nil-rated. The Tribunal also accepted the view that Heading 7204 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 covered only scrap generally used for re-melting and would not, by itself, justify denial of exemption to re-rollable scrap. No tangible evidence was produced by the department to show that the scrap purchased from the market and used in manufacture was non-duty paid.
Conclusion: The re-rollable scrap was eligible for the exemption, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The order granting exemption was sustained, and the Revenue appeal was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where re-rollable scrap is purchased from the open market and the department fails to prove that it was non-duty paid, the benefit of the exemption notifications cannot be denied merely by classifying the material under Heading 7204.