<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 514 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121654</link>
    <description>Re-rollable scrap purchased from the open market and used in manufacturing M.S. rods was treated as eligible for exemption under Notifications 90/88-C.E. and 202/88-C.E. The Tribunal relied on the Ministry&#039;s Circular No. 27/89 and the deeming fiction in Notification 202/88-C.E., under which domestic stocks of inputs are treated as duty-paid unless clearly identifiable as non-duty-paid or nil-rated. It also noted that Heading 7204 of the Central Excise Tariff, by itself, does not justify denial of exemption for re-rollable scrap. In the absence of tangible evidence from the department that the scrap was non-duty-paid, exemption could not be denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 12:53:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 514 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121654</link>
      <description>Re-rollable scrap purchased from the open market and used in manufacturing M.S. rods was treated as eligible for exemption under Notifications 90/88-C.E. and 202/88-C.E. The Tribunal relied on the Ministry&#039;s Circular No. 27/89 and the deeming fiction in Notification 202/88-C.E., under which domestic stocks of inputs are treated as duty-paid unless clearly identifiable as non-duty-paid or nil-rated. It also noted that Heading 7204 of the Central Excise Tariff, by itself, does not justify denial of exemption for re-rollable scrap. In the absence of tangible evidence from the department that the scrap was non-duty-paid, exemption could not be denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>