Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether solar power traffic signal systems and solar street lights were covered by the exemption notifications for non-conventional energy devices/systems.
Analysis: The goods were examined with reference to the relevant exemption entries, which covered non-conventional energy devices/systems specified in the prescribed list. The reasoning accepted that solar energy is a form of non-conventional energy and that the list included several solar-based applications. The impugned goods operated on electricity converted from solar energy and were treated as falling within the expression "other applications" in the list. The interpretation adopted rejected a narrow grammatical approach and applied the principle of ejusdem generis to give effect to the scope and spirit of the notifications.
Conclusion: The goods were held eligible for the exemption notifications, and the denial of benefit was unsustainable.