Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in a case of provisional assessment under the Central Excise Rules, 2002, the assessee was entitled to interim stay without pre-deposit where the duty finally assessed was less than the duty provisionally assessed.
Analysis: The amount of duty paid on provisional assessment was higher than the amount finally assessed, and that factual position was not disputed. Rule 7(2) binds the assessee in provisional assessment to pay the difference between the duty finally assessed and the duty provisionally assessed. On that basis, the application for interim relief was examined only prima facie, and the existence of a differential in favour of the assessee supported grant of stay without insisting on pre-deposit.
Conclusion: Interim stay without pre-deposit was granted in favour of the assessee.