<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 384 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119989</link>
    <description>In provisional assessment under the Central Excise Rules, 2002, Rule 7(2) requires the assessee to pay only the difference between the duty finally assessed and the duty provisionally assessed. Where the duty paid on provisional assessment exceeded the final duty, that factual position supported interim relief on a prima facie basis. The differential being in favour of the assessee, the request for stay was granted without insisting on pre-deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:49:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 384 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119989</link>
      <description>In provisional assessment under the Central Excise Rules, 2002, Rule 7(2) requires the assessee to pay only the difference between the duty finally assessed and the duty provisionally assessed. Where the duty paid on provisional assessment exceeded the final duty, that factual position supported interim relief on a prima facie basis. The differential being in favour of the assessee, the request for stay was granted without insisting on pre-deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>