Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether waiver of pre-deposit of penalty and stay of recovery were justified where the applicants claimed the benefit of Small Scale Exemption and no duty was payable on the excisable goods.
Analysis: The penalty had been imposed under Rule 173Q and Rule 209 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The applicants were availing Small Scale Exemption, and the record indicated that no duty was payable on the goods in question. Since the provisions invoked contemplated penalty in relation to excisable goods on which duty was payable, the basis for imposing penalty was not made out on the facts noted in the record.
Conclusion: The waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of the penalty was stayed till disposal of the appeal.