<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 378 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119767</link>
    <description>Penalty under Rule 173Q and Rule 209 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was challenged on the basis that the applicants were entitled to Small Scale Exemption and no duty was payable on the goods. On the record, the tribunal noted that the penalty provisions were invoked in relation to excisable goods on which duty was payable, and that factual basis was not made out. Waiver of pre-deposit was therefore granted and recovery of the penalty was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 10:37:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 378 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119767</link>
      <description>Penalty under Rule 173Q and Rule 209 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was challenged on the basis that the applicants were entitled to Small Scale Exemption and no duty was payable on the goods. On the record, the tribunal noted that the penalty provisions were invoked in relation to excisable goods on which duty was payable, and that factual basis was not made out. Waiver of pre-deposit was therefore granted and recovery of the penalty was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>