Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Herbal Shikakai Powder cleared in bulk to another manufacturer was classifiable under Chapter 14 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and, if so, whether it was not excisable.
Analysis: The product had already been held, in relation to retail packs manufactured out of the same bulk powder, to fall under Heading 33.05. Following that reasoning and the earlier Tribunal decision on similar facts, bulk clearance of Herbal Shikakai Powder was treated as falling under Chapter 14 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. A product so classified was not exigible to central excise for the relevant period.
Conclusion: The bulk product was classifiable under Chapter 14 and was not excisable.