Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the items in dispute, namely starter motor, cables, switch board and control panel, feeder table structure and spares for bagging machine, were eligible as capital goods for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 for the relevant periods before and after the amendment introduced by Notification No. 14/96-C.E. (N.T.) dated 23.07.1996.
Analysis: The starter motor was used for operating the I.D. fan, which discharged flue gas necessary for the manufacture of sugar, and therefore had a direct functional nexus with production. Cables used for transmission of power within the factory were covered as plant or as components, spare parts or accessories of plant. The switch board and control panel, falling under Heading 85.37, were eligible under the amended Rule 57Q. The feeder table structure supported the cane table conveyor and was used in material handling essential for production, while cables received both before and after the amendment were covered under the relevant clauses of the definition of capital goods. The spares for the bagging machine were received prior to the date assumed by the lower authority, and the bagging machine used for packing sugar formed part of the manufacturing process, with its spares also qualifying under the rule.
Conclusion: All the disputed items were held eligible for capital goods credit, and the assessee succeeded on both appeals.