Modvat credit cannot be denied for Bill of Entry technicalities when duty-paid inputs are received in the factory.

Modvat credit cannot be denied on a technical defect in the Bill of Entry where duty-paid inputs are received in the factory and the substantive conditions for credit are otherwise satisfied. Board circulars supported allowing credit when the Bill of Entry stood in the name of the head office or registered office, and the record showed no dispute about the duty-paid character of the inputs or their receipt in the appellant's factory. On that basis, the objection that the full quantity had not been transferred was treated as insufficient to defeat credit, and the disallowance and penalty were unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be denied merely because the Bill of Entry stood in the name of the head office and the entire quantity covered by it was not transferred, when the duty-paid inputs were received in the appellant's factory.

Analysis: The relevant Board circulars indicated that credit should not be denied on technical grounds where the bill of entry is in the name of the registered office or head office, and where the duty-paid inputs are received in the factory. The record showed no dispute as to the duty-paid character of the inputs or their receipt in the appellant's factory. In these circumstances, the objection based on the name in the Bill of Entry and the alleged non-transfer of the full quantity was treated as insufficient to deny credit.

Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible and the disallowance and penalty were unsustainable.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the appellant obtained consequential relief.

Ratio Decidendi: Modvat credit cannot be denied on a technical or procedural defect in the Bill of Entry where the duty-paid inputs are received in the factory and the substantive conditions for credit are satisfied.

---