Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay in respect of the demand arising from denial of Modvat credit on oxygen gas cylinders claimed as capital goods.
Analysis: The claim was examined on a prima facie basis. The Tribunal noted the Department's objection that the cylinders fell under Chapter Heading 7311.00 and were not covered as capital goods under Rule 2 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002. Reference to the liberal interpretation of capital goods in relation to Rule 57Q did not persuade the Tribunal to treat oxygen gas cylinders as covered for the present claim. On that assessment, no prima facie case for complete waiver was found.
Conclusion: The request for full waiver was declined and the appellant was directed to make a pre-deposit, with stay operating only upon compliance.
Final Conclusion: Interim relief was granted only conditionally, and the matter was disposed of by requiring part pre-deposit as a prerequisite for continuation of the stay.
Ratio Decidendi: A claim for waiver of pre-deposit can be declined where, on a prima facie assessment, the goods in question do not appear to fall within the statutory concept of capital goods.