Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant, being a registered dealer/trader, could be subjected to penalty under Rule 13(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002, and whether pre-deposit of the penalty was to be waived pending appeal.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the appellant was a trader who had passed on Modvat credit on duty-paid goods dealt with by it. Rule 13(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 was held to be invocable only against a person who had availed the Modvat credit and not against a registered dealer. On that basis, the Tribunal found that the appellant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of the penalty and stay of recovery.
Conclusion: The penalty pre-deposit was waived and recovery of the penalty was stayed till disposal of the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: Penalty under Rule 13(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 could not be sustained against a registered dealer who had not availed the credit, where a prima facie case for relief was shown.