<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 392 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117653</link>
    <description>Rule 13(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 was treated as applicable only to a person who had availed Modvat credit, not to a registered dealer/trader who merely passed on credit on duty-paid goods. On that basis, the Tribunal held that the appellant had shown a prima facie case against the penalty and was entitled to waiver of the pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 15:47:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 392 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117653</link>
      <description>Rule 13(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 was treated as applicable only to a person who had availed Modvat credit, not to a registered dealer/trader who merely passed on credit on duty-paid goods. On that basis, the Tribunal held that the appellant had shown a prima facie case against the penalty and was entitled to waiver of the pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>