TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>CESTAT rules in favor of appellant on Modvat credit eligibility for plastic spoons</h1> <h3>ULTRAPACK Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, HYDERABAD</h3> ULTRAPACK Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, HYDERABAD - 2005 (192) E.L.T. 540 (Tri. - Bang.) Issues:1. Eligibility of Modvat credit for plastic spoons supplied with the product 'Robin Blue'.Analysis:The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore dealt with the issue of Modvat credit eligibility for plastic spoons supplied with 'Robin Blue' by the manufacturers. The Revenue contended that the plastic spoons were merely accessories and not essential for marketing the product. The appellant argued citing a precedent where similar circumstances allowed Modvat credit for plastic spoons supplied with another product. The Tribunal considered the submissions and referred to the precedent case, emphasizing that the judgment relied upon by the Revenue was distinguishable as it involved essential components for making the final product operational and marketable. Therefore, based on the precedent and legal arguments, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.The crux of the issue revolved around whether the plastic spoons supplied with 'Robin Blue' were eligible for Modvat credit. The Tribunal analyzed the arguments presented by both parties and referred to a relevant precedent to support the appellant's claim. The Tribunal highlighted the distinction between essential components and accessories in determining the eligibility for Modvat credit. By setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal, the Tribunal established the eligibility of Modvat credit for the plastic spoons supplied with the product based on the precedent and legal principles discussed during the proceedings.In conclusion, the judgment provided clarity on the eligibility of Modvat credit for accessories supplied with a product like 'Robin Blue.' By referencing a relevant precedent and distinguishing it from the case at hand, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the importance of legal precedents and the distinction between essential components and accessories in such matters. The decision underscored the significance of legal interpretations and precedents in resolving disputes related to Modvat credit eligibility for accompanying products like plastic spoons.
TaxTMI 