Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported aluminium skylight panels/glass panels, intended for use in a hotel project, were covered by Notification No. 110/95-Cus. as capital goods so as to justify waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.
Analysis: The notification defined capital goods to include plant, machinery, equipment and accessories required for manufacture, specified activities, and rendering services. The Tribunal noted that earlier decisions had taken a broad view of the expression "plant" in the context of hotel-related imports under the same notification, and that goods used as part of a building could fall within that expression. On that basis, the Tribunal found a prima facie case in favour of the appellant for interim relief.
Conclusion: The imports were treated as prima facie eligible for coverage under the notification, and full waiver of pre-deposit with stay of recovery was granted.