TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal dismissed for Modvat credit denial due to invoice discrepancy and lack of permission.</h1> <h3>DEVILAL KUTIR SOAP Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, JAIPUR-II</h3> DEVILAL KUTIR SOAP Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, JAIPUR-II - 2005 (192) E.L.T. 562 (Tri. - Del.) The appeal was filed against the denial of Modvat credit due to some invoices not being 'duplicate for transporter copy' and not in the name of the appellant. The appellant did not contest this, and as per a previous Tribunal ruling, credit can be taken on the original invoice only after permission from the proper office if the duplicate copy is lost during transit. Since no such request was made and some invoices were not in the appellant's name, the credit was rightly denied. The appeal was dismissed. (2005 (1) TMI 562 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI)
TaxTMI 