Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether pre-deposit of the demanded duty and equal penalty should be waived and recovery stayed during the pendency of the appeal.
Analysis: The application concerned waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty arising from demands relating to ready-made garments and tailoring activity. The applicant relied on Rule 4(3) of the Central Excise Rules, 2001 and contended that garments falling under Chapter 61 or 62 were not liable to central excise duty under that rule. On a prima facie assessment, the Tribunal found that the applicant had a strong case for interim relief.
Conclusion: Pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived and recovery was stayed during the pendency of the appeal, in favour of the assessee.