<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 589 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115848</link>
    <description>Waiver of pre-deposit was sought against duty and equal penalty demands arising from ready-made garments and tailoring activity. The applicant argued that garments classifiable under Chapters 61 or 62 were not liable to central excise duty under Rule 4(3) of the Central Excise Rules, 2001. On a prima facie assessment, the Tribunal found a strong case for interim relief. Pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived, and recovery was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 15:57:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 589 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115848</link>
      <description>Waiver of pre-deposit was sought against duty and equal penalty demands arising from ready-made garments and tailoring activity. The applicant argued that garments classifiable under Chapters 61 or 62 were not liable to central excise duty under Rule 4(3) of the Central Excise Rules, 2001. On a prima facie assessment, the Tribunal found a strong case for interim relief. Pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived, and recovery was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>