Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Hexane was eligible for exemption under Sr. No. 8 of Table to Notification 75/84 when used in miscella refining of in-house solvent-extracted oil, and whether the matter required remand for verification of actual use.
Analysis: The condition in the notification was read as not restricting the use of Hexane only to the initial solvent extraction stage. The expression referring to use in the manufacture of solvent-extracted fixed vegetable oil was held broad enough to cover operations incidental and ancillary to making the extracted oil marketable, particularly where the process was carried out in the same . At the same time, the record did not clearly establish that the Hexane was used exclusively for in-house solvent-extracted oil and not for refining already existing oils, so factual verification was necessary.
Conclusion: The exemption question was not finally decided on merits and the matter was remanded to the original authority for de novo adjudication with directions to quantify and allow the benefit only for Hexane used in miscella refining of in-house solvent-extracted oils.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a notification grants exemption for goods intended for use in the manufacture of solvent-extracted fixed vegetable oil, the benefit may extend to incidental and ancillary processing of in-house extracted oil, but eligibility depends on factual proof of the actual use of the goods.