Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to carry forward and set off the loss where the return was not filed in accordance with section 139(3) and the loss had nonetheless been determined.
Analysis: The relevant version of section 80, read with section 139 as it stood for the assessment year in question, did not then require an express reference to section 139(3). The legislative history showed that, before the later amendment, a return filed under section 139 generally was sufficient for determination of loss and its carry forward. The comparison with the earlier regime under the 1922 Act and the successive amendments to sections 80 and 139(3) showed that the restriction pressed by the Revenue was not applicable to the period concerned.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to carry forward and set off the loss. The question was answered in the affirmative, in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: For the relevant assessment year, a loss determined on a return filed under section 139 could be carried forward and set off notwithstanding the absence of compliance with the later-amended requirement of section 139(3).
Ratio Decidendi: Where, at the material time, section 80 referred to a return filed under section 139 without specifically confining the benefit to section 139(3), a belated return filed under section 139 could still support determination and carry forward of loss.