Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2005 (8) TMI 411 - AT - Customs

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal overturns exclusion of EU imports from anti-dumping duty, orders modification of Customs Notification The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the exclusion of imports from the European Union from anti-dumping duty unjustified. It concluded that the ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                          Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Tribunal overturns exclusion of EU imports from anti-dumping duty, orders modification of Customs Notification

                            The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the exclusion of imports from the European Union from anti-dumping duty unjustified. It concluded that the methodology for injury analysis was flawed, emphasizing the need to consider the impact of all dumped imports, including low-priced ones. The Tribunal ordered the modification of Customs Notification No. 123/2002 to impose anti-dumping duty on Poly Iso Butylene imports from the European Union.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Exclusion of exports from European Union and Thailand from the levy of anti-dumping duty.
                            2. Determination of causal link between dumped imports and injury to domestic industry.
                            3. Methodology for injury analysis and causal link determination.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Exclusion of Exports from European Union and Thailand:
                            The appellant, a manufacturer of Poly Iso Butylene in India, filed a petition alleging that the product was being dumped into India from several countries, causing injury to the domestic industry. The Designated Authority (DA) concluded that dumping was occurring and recommended anti-dumping duties, but excluded exports from the European Union and Thailand. The appellant challenged this exclusion. During the hearing, the appellant gave up the plea against Thailand due to lack of specific evidence, so the focus remained on the European Union.

                            2. Determination of Causal Link:
                            The DA's Final Finding stated that the average landed value of exports from the European Union and Thailand during the Period of Investigation was higher than the Non-Injurious Price (NIP) for the domestic industry, thus no causal link was established between these exports and the injury. The appellant contended that this analysis was erroneous, arguing that only imports below the NIP should be considered to determine the cause of injury. The appellant emphasized that the DA's method contradicted the "Principles for Determination of Injury" in Annexure-II of the Customs Tariff Rules, 1995, which require considering the effect of dumped imports on domestic prices.

                            3. Methodology for Injury Analysis and Causal Link Determination:
                            The appellant argued that the DA's reliance on average prices was flawed, as averages do not accurately reflect the impact of imports at different price levels. The appellant highlighted that very low-priced imports significantly affected domestic prices and should be the focus of the causal link analysis. The appellant also pointed out that the DA had previously acknowledged severe price undercutting due to dumped imports, which should have been considered in the causal link analysis.

                            The Counsels for the DA and the Interested Party (Importer) contended that the analysis should consider the overall effect of all dumped imports, not just low-priced ones. They argued that focusing solely on low-priced imports would lead to an invariable finding of injury in all cases. They also referenced a WTO Panel decision, which supported analyzing the effect of dumped imports as a whole.

                            Findings and Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal noted that the DA had accepted that imports from the European Union were at dumped prices and that the injury finding was based on the cumulative effect of all dumped imports. The Tribunal found that the DA's reliance on average prices in a volatile market situation was unreliable. It emphasized that the exclusion of the European Union was not justified, as significant quantities of low-priced imports from this region could not be ignored.

                            The Tribunal concluded that the DA's methodology for injury analysis and causal link determination was flawed and that the exclusion of imports from the European Union was incorrect. The Customs Notification No. 123/2002 should be modified to impose anti-dumping duty on imports of Poly Iso Butylene from the European Union.

                            Order:
                            The appeal was allowed, and it was ordered that the Customs Notification No. 123/2002 be modified to include anti-dumping duty on imports from the European Union.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found