<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 411 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115413</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the exclusion of imports from the European Union from anti-dumping duty unjustified. It concluded that the methodology for injury analysis was flawed, emphasizing the need to consider the impact of all dumped imports, including low-priced ones. The Tribunal ordered the modification of Customs Notification No. 123/2002 to impose anti-dumping duty on Poly Iso Butylene imports from the European Union.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 14:51:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 411 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115413</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the exclusion of imports from the European Union from anti-dumping duty unjustified. It concluded that the methodology for injury analysis was flawed, emphasizing the need to consider the impact of all dumped imports, including low-priced ones. The Tribunal ordered the modification of Customs Notification No. 123/2002 to impose anti-dumping duty on Poly Iso Butylene imports from the European Union.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>