Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods manufactured by the assessee were pre-fabricated buildings classifiable under Heading 94.06 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, or components classifiable under Heading 7308.90 of the Tariff; and whether penalty was sustainable in a classification dispute.
Analysis: The goods manufactured were links, balls, foot plates, deco joints, clips, wooden panels and castrol wheels. These items did not, by themselves, constitute pre-fabricated buildings and did not have the essential character of such buildings. Note 4 to Chapter 94 defines pre-fabricated buildings as buildings finished in the factory or assembled on site from cleared elements, and there was no material to show that the goods would result in a pre-fabricated building on assembly. Since the classification adopted in the impugned order was correct, the demand of duty was upheld. As the dispute related to classification, penalty was found not exigible.
Conclusion: The duty demand was sustained and the penalty was set aside.