<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 489 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114800</link>
    <description>Goods such as links, balls, foot plates, deco joints, clips, wooden panels and castor wheels were held not to have the essential character of pre-fabricated buildings under Heading 94.06, because there was no material to show that their assembly would itself result in a completed pre-fabricated building. They were treated as components under Heading 7308.90, so the duty demand was sustained. In the classification dispute, penalty was held not exigible and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 12:25:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 489 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114800</link>
      <description>Goods such as links, balls, foot plates, deco joints, clips, wooden panels and castor wheels were held not to have the essential character of pre-fabricated buildings under Heading 94.06, because there was no material to show that their assembly would itself result in a completed pre-fabricated building. They were treated as components under Heading 7308.90, so the duty demand was sustained. In the classification dispute, penalty was held not exigible and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114800</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>