Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a manufacturer opting out of the Modvat scheme and availing small scale exemption was required under Rule 57H(7) to debit the credit relatable to inputs contained in finished goods lying in stock on the date of such option.
Analysis: The appellants had been availing small scale exemption based on the value of clearances and were therefore governed by Rule 57H(7) of the Central Excise Rules. That rule required a manufacturer who opts for exemption from the whole of the duty and who had been taking credit on inputs to pay an amount equivalent to the credit allowed in respect of inputs lying in stock or used in any finished excisable goods lying in stock on the date the option was exercised. The demand in these appeals was confined to credit taken on inputs contained in the finished products lying in stock when the appellants opted out of Modvat. The authorities cited by the appellants did not govern this situation because the rule itself contained a specific obligation to reverse the credit in such circumstances.
Conclusion: The appellants were required to reverse the credit attributable to inputs contained in finished goods lying in stock, and the demand was correctly upheld.