Modvat credit and later exemption: valid credit need not be reversed entirely, though limited reversal may apply to exempt clearances.

Modvat credit validly taken when the final product was dutiable does not become irregular merely because the product is later exempted. Reversal is required only to the extent that duty paid inputs remain attributable to exempt clearances of unfinished or uncleared goods. On that basis, separate recovery of duty was not justified, and penalty and interest were not sustainable where the credit was originally validly availed.

---

---

Issues: Whether Modvat credit validly taken when the final product was dutiable was required to be reversed on the subsequent exemption of the final product, and whether duty, penalty and interest could be recovered on that basis.

Analysis: The credit was taken at a time when the final product was dutiable and was therefore validly availed under the Modvat scheme. The later exemption of the final product did not by itself render the earlier credit irregular. However, where the final products manufactured with the duty paid inputs remained uncleared and the product had since become exempt, reversal of the credit was warranted to that extent. Since the credit was otherwise validly taken, there was no basis for separate recovery of duty on that count, and the consequences of penalty and interest were not sustainable.

Conclusion: The requirement of reversal of Modvat credit was upheld to the limited extent indicated, but recovery of duty, penalty and interest was set aside.

Ratio Decidendi: Validly taken Modvat credit is not lost merely because the final product is subsequently exempted, though reversal may be required where the corresponding inputs remain unutilised for exempt clearances; penal and interest consequences do not follow in the absence of irregularly taken credit.

---