Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondents were entitled to take Modvat credit at 15% ad valorem, or whether the credit was restricted to 10% ad valorem under Notification No. 5/94-C.E. (N.T.), dated 1-3-1994, in respect of inputs received after the notification had expired.
Analysis: The restriction under Notification No. 5/94-C.E. (N.T.) applied only so long as the notification remained in force. Since the notification expired on 28-2-1999, the limitation to credit at 10% ad valorem also ceased thereafter. The inputs were received after that date, and the invoices showed duty at 15% ad valorem. In those circumstances, the respondents were entitled to avail credit at the same rate.
Conclusion: The credit at 15% ad valorem was correctly allowed, and the Revenue's challenge failed.