<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 457 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114190</link>
    <description>Modvat credit under Notification No. 5/94-C.E. (N.T.) was restricted to 10% ad valorem only while the notification remained in force; once it expired on 28-2-1999, that restriction ceased. Inputs received after expiry, where invoices reflected duty at 15% ad valorem, could therefore qualify for credit at that rate. The CESTAT held that the respondents were entitled to avail credit at 15% ad valorem and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 10:59:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 457 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114190</link>
      <description>Modvat credit under Notification No. 5/94-C.E. (N.T.) was restricted to 10% ad valorem only while the notification remained in force; once it expired on 28-2-1999, that restriction ceased. Inputs received after expiry, where invoices reflected duty at 15% ad valorem, could therefore qualify for credit at that rate. The CESTAT held that the respondents were entitled to avail credit at 15% ad valorem and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>