Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Pitch Creosote Mixture was entitled to exemption under the relevant tariff notifications covering tar.
Analysis: The issue was whether the expression "tar" in the exemption notifications covered partially distilled tars and blends of pitch with creosote oils or other coal tar distillation products. The Tribunal noted that the Supreme Court had already construed the inclusive entry in the tariff item to bring such mixtures within the scope of tar, and examined Notification No. 75/84 and found no material difference from the earlier notification considered by the Supreme Court.
Conclusion: The exemption applied to Pitch Creosote Mixture, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief to the appellants.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a later exemption notification contains no material distinction from an earlier notification already construed by the Supreme Court, the same inclusive tariff meaning governs and the exemption extends to the covered product.