TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to full waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of the duty and penalty demanded on the alleged wrongful availment of credit on imported goods.
Analysis: The application for adjournment was declined and the stay request was considered on merits. The claim for credit was found, prima facie, to be unsupported because the requirement in the Board circular that the importer should file a declaration on the reverse of the bill of entry and have it endorsed by the proper customs officer had not been complied with. The appellant also failed to show evidence of transfer of the goods and the relied-upon public notice was found inapplicable to the issue. On that basis, the case did not justify complete waiver, though some conditional relief was warranted.
Conclusion: Full waiver was denied. The appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 1.90 lakhs and, on production of proof within the stipulated period, the balance of the credit demand and penalty would remain waived and recovery stayed.
Final Conclusion: The stay application was only partly allowed, with conditional pre-deposit imposed and the remaining demand kept in abeyance upon compliance.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the assessee fails to establish a prima facie entitlement to credit and cannot show compliance with the prescribed documentary safeguards, complete waiver of pre-deposit is not warranted, though conditional stay may be granted.
TaxTMI 
