<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 579 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113724</link>
    <description>A CESTAT stay application on alleged wrongful credit on imported goods turned on prima facie compliance with documentary safeguards for CENVAT credit. The tribunal found that the importer had not filed the prescribed declaration on the reverse of the bill of entry, had not obtained endorsement by the proper customs officer, and had not shown evidence of transfer of the goods; the relied-upon public notice was also held inapplicable. Full waiver of pre-deposit was therefore not justified, but conditional relief was considered appropriate, with partial pre-deposit and suspension of the balance demand subject to compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 10:49:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 579 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113724</link>
      <description>A CESTAT stay application on alleged wrongful credit on imported goods turned on prima facie compliance with documentary safeguards for CENVAT credit. The tribunal found that the importer had not filed the prescribed declaration on the reverse of the bill of entry, had not obtained endorsement by the proper customs officer, and had not shown evidence of transfer of the goods; the relied-upon public notice was also held inapplicable. Full waiver of pre-deposit was therefore not justified, but conditional relief was considered appropriate, with partial pre-deposit and suspension of the balance demand subject to compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>