Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on the disputed items of capital goods, and whether the item not included in the declaration could still qualify for credit.
Analysis: The disputed articles were described as components of manufacturing equipment, testing instruments, safety equipment, and allied fittings. In light of the Supreme Court ruling on the scope of capital goods, such items fell within the eligible category for Modvat credit. One item, namely the Auto Ranging Conductivity Meter, was not pressed because the declaration requirement was not satisfied under Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was held admissible on the disputed items other than the unpressed item, and the assessee succeeded to that extent.