Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Companies Law

        2007 (12) TMI 281 - HC - Companies Law

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court approves restructuring scheme for M/s. SJK Steel Plant under Companies Act The court sanctioned the scheme of arrangement sought by M/s. SJK Steel Plant Limited under sections 100, 391, and 392 of the Companies Act, 1956. The ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Court approves restructuring scheme for M/s. SJK Steel Plant under Companies Act

                            The court sanctioned the scheme of arrangement sought by M/s. SJK Steel Plant Limited under sections 100, 391, and 392 of the Companies Act, 1956. The scheme, aimed at restructuring loans and shares to enhance financial viability, was approved by stakeholders. The Central Government's objections were dismissed, and the court found the scheme compliant with the Companies Act, 1956, with a modification. The scheme was declared binding on the company and stakeholders, with the petitioner directed to file the order and pay costs to the Central Government.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Sanction of the Scheme of Compromise/Arrangement
                            2. Objections by the Central Government
                            3. Compliance with the Companies Act, 1956

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Sanction of the Scheme of Compromise/Arrangement:
                            The petitioner, M/s. SJK Steel Plant Limited, sought court sanction for a scheme of compromise/arrangement under sections 100, 391, and 392 of the Companies Act, 1956. The scheme was unanimously approved by the equity shareholders, 96.90% of the secured creditors, and 100% of the preference shareholders. The court emphasized that it should approve the scheme unless it contravenes any law or is intended to defeat stakeholder interests through fraud or misrepresentation. The primary objective of the scheme was to make the business financially viable by restructuring term loans, working capital loans, and equity/preferential shares.

                            2. Objections by the Central Government:
                            The Central Government raised four objections:

                            Objection No. 1:
                            The conversion of preference shares with accumulated dividends into Funded Interest Term Loans (FITL) and their waiver on repayment of term loans was argued to be contrary to section 80(1)(a) of the Act. The court found that section 80 does not prohibit the conversion of preference shares into a loan and dismissed this objection.

                            Objection No. 2:
                            The conversion of a term loan into equity shares with a condition for transfer to M/s. Kalyani Steels was argued to restrict the free transferability of shares. The court held that since the petitioner-company is unlisted, there is no bar under the Act for such a condition, and thus, this objection was dismissed.

                            Objection No. 3:
                            The scheme's provision for redeeming non-cumulative redeemable preference shares (NCRPS) after the repayment of secured creditors' dues in 2028 was argued to be contrary to section 80(5A) of the Act, which prohibits the issuance of preference shares redeemable after 20 years. The court modified the clause to ensure NCRPS would be redeemed on or before March 31, 2026, or else fresh NCRPS would be issued.

                            Objection No. 4:
                            The Central Government contended that M/s. Kalyani Steels and the promoters did not file undertakings to contribute equity capital and additional funds, respectively. The court found that M/s. Kalyani Steels had already extended working capital support, and the promoters had brought in an interest-free unsecured loan of Rs. 18.00 crores. Thus, this objection was also dismissed.

                            3. Compliance with the Companies Act, 1956:
                            The court referred to several precedents, including the Supreme Court's decision in Miheer H. Mafatlal v. Mafatlal Industries Ltd., which established that a scheme of arrangement must comply with statutory procedures and should not contravene any provision of law. The court concluded that the scheme, with the modification to clause A of Chapter B of Part III, did not violate any provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, and was not contrary to public policy.

                            Conclusion:
                            The court sanctioned the scheme of arrangement, declaring it binding on the company, its equity/preference shareholders, and secured creditors, subject to the modification of clause A of Chapter B of Part III. The petitioner-company was directed to file a certified copy of the order with the Registrar of Companies within thirty days and to pay costs of Rs. 5,000 to the Assistant Solicitor General for the Central Government. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found