Laundry soap classification for Khadi units secured excise exemption; re-characterisation as detergent was rejected.

A Khadi and Village Industries unit's product was treated as laundry soap, because the record and prior Tribunal decisions in the same matter consistently classified it under the laundry soap entry. On that basis, the exemption meant for laundry soaps manufactured by factories owned by or approved by the Khadi and Village Industries Commission applied, and the Revenue could not deny relief by re-characterising the product as synthetic detergent. The excise demand was therefore not sustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant's product was classifiable as laundry soap under sub-heading 3401.13 and consequently entitled to exemption from excise duty under the relevant notification.

Analysis: The product was manufactured by a cooperative society registered under the Khadi and Village Industries Act and the record showed that the appellant had consistently claimed it to be laundry soap. Earlier Tribunal decisions in the appellant's own case had already treated the product as falling under the laundry soap entry, and the Revenue's attempt to characterise the plea as an afterthought was found unsustainable. Since the exemption was specifically intended for laundry soaps produced by factories owned by or approved by the Khadi and Village Industries Commission, the denial of exemption on the premise that the product was synthetic detergent could not be sustained.

Conclusion: The product was held to be eligible for exemption as laundry soap, and the demand confirming duty was not sustainable.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a product manufactured by an approved Khadi and Village Industries unit is established on the record and by prior binding classification decisions to be laundry soap, it is entitled to the exemption meant for laundry soaps and cannot be denied the benefit merely by re-characterising it as synthetic detergent.

---